Rather than placement, the quality of education which the educational institute provides should be given first preference. However, we can’t completely ignore the placement factor too as we are living in the materialistic age. It is the age in which money is chosen over the values. If the education of a particular institute is good, the student when comes out, definitely grab the fatly paid job due to his talent. Even, those colleges which have good placement record can’t be able to get their weak students the worthy placement offers.
Note: This paragraph is a clear evidence of my lack of knowledge related to the subject. Tried to increase it through web world but not much available except the definition of ‘placement’L
Like your frankness in the 'note' to admit that you do not enough knowledge to make detailed comment on the given topic.
ReplyDeletegood language use of work.no grametical mistek. carry on.
ReplyDeleteThanks Chaula....looking forward to read your blogs
ReplyDeleteHello Bhagirath,
ReplyDeleteI like,here,your way of answering that you have given your very frank view about the "placements" and all, Now, Bhagirath, give me the answer of this one... Suppose,the quality of education has not been given the first preference but placement, then how far it is important for students.
Overall,nice attempt.Keep it up.
Thank You.
Thanks a bunch Payal!
ReplyDeleteFrankly, I'm finding it very hard in replying your query. However attempting my level best.
At time, even though studying in the worst college, with his hard work, one can be talented enough to competent with other students in getting the jobs. so it depends on students capabilities. It must be admitted that weak student studied in college with high placement rate fails to grab lucrative job.
this is my last take on this sticky topic
(After typing whole para, I'm asking myself "Is it answer to your question or miss my target?")